The Right and Wrong Uses of the Bible
By
R. Heber Newton.
"In it is contained God's true Word."—Homily on the Holy Scriptures.
New York:
John W. Lovell Company,
14 & 16 Vesey Street.
Works by the Same Author.
The Morals. 1. Vol. 12mo, cloth, gilt, $1.00 Studies of Jesus. 1 vol. 12mo, cloth, gilt, 1.00 Womanhood. 1 vol. 12mo, cloth, gilt, 1.25The above all will be sent by mail, postpaid, on receipt of price, by
John W. Lovell Co.
14 and 16 Vesey St., New York.
Copyright, 1883
Contents.
Preface
- The Unreal Bible.
- This theory has no sufficient sanction by the Church.
- The Bible nowhere makes any such claim of infallibility for itself.
- The Bible carries the refutation of this claim upon the face of its writings.
- The growth of this theory is plain to us, and discredits its authority.
- This theory is incapable of a statement which is not self-stultifying.
- This theory of our Bible is, in our age, seen to be the same theory which all peoples have entertained of their bibles.
- The Real Bible.
-
- These books have the venerableness which belongs to ancient writings.
- These books form the literature of a noble race.
- This literature of the Jewish nation and of the Christian Church is intrinsically noble.
- This literature has been very influential in the development of progressive civilization.
-
-
- It is a wrong use of the Bible to set it in its entirety before all classes and all ages.
- It is a wrong use of the Bible to accept its utterances indiscriminately as the words of God, to quote every saying of every speaker in its pages, or every deed of every actor in its histories as expressing to us the mind of God.
- It is a wrong use of the Bible to accept everything recorded therein as necessarily true.
- It is a wrong use of the Bible to consult it as a heathen oracle for the determining of our judgments and the decision of our actions.
- It is a wrong use of the Bible to go to it, as the
- It is a wrong use of the Bible to go to it as an authority in any sphere save the spheres of theology and of religion.
- It is a wrong use of the Bible, for the purposes of theology or religion, to give its language any other meaning than that which similar language would have under similar circumstances.
- It is a wrong use of the Bible to construct a theology out of it, by the mechanical system of proof texts in vogue in the churches.
- It is a wrong use of the Bible to disregard the chronological order of its parts in constructing our theology.
- It is a wrong use of the Bible to cite its authors as of equal authority, even in the spheres of theology and religion.
- It is a wrong use of the Bible to manufacture cut of it any one uniform, system, of theology, as the fixed and final form of thought in which religion is to live.
- Every aid of outward form should be used to make these books appear as living "letters" to us.
- Each writing having an intrinsic unity should, by such aids, be studied as a whole.
- Each great book should, as a whole, be read in its proper place in Hebrew and Christian history.
- The books which are of a composite character should be read in their several parts, and traced to their proper places in history.
- These writings should be read critically, until we can decipher the successive hands working upon them, and interpret them accordingly.
- The Epoch of Moses: B.C. 1300(?).
-
- We have here the simple, homely, prudential aspects of virtue, which have always been particularly powerful on certain ages and classes.
- These laws of life that work for our health and wealth loom, however, into mystic and sacred forms, as of the laws heavenly and eternal, whose "seat is the bosom of God."
- The Law thus mystic and sacred is seen to be both the law of nature and the law of the human soul.
- The Bible leads us on to that sense of sin, in the presence of this "Law," which no lower thought of law can quicken.
- The Bible wakens in the breast of man an ethical passion for the ideal and eternal law, which, apart from early Buddhism, has no parallel in history.
- The Bible reveals these ethical ideals as no mere alluring visions, but as the substantial realities of being.
- The Bible thus inspires a buoyancy and exhilaration which feed the fresh forces of all noble life.
- The Bible leads this sense of Law into that awful vision wherein "Conscious Law is King of kings."
- God speaks in a man.
- "When Sir Walter Scott lay in his last illness..."
"The Gospel doth not so much consist in verbis as in virtute."
John Smith.
"Liberty in prophesying, without prescribing authoritatively to other men's consciences, and becoming lords and masters of their faith—a necessity derived from the consideration of the difficulty of Scripture in questions controverted, and the uncertainty of any internal medium of interpretation."
Jeremy Taylor.
"To those who follow their reason in the interpretation of the Scriptures, God will either give his grace for assistance to find the truth, or His pardon if they miss it."
Lord Falkland.
[Rational Theology in England in the Seventeenth Century; John Tulloch, D.D., II: 181, I:398, I:160]