You are here

قراءة كتاب Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 156, Jan. 8, 1919

تنويه: تعرض هنا نبذة من اول ١٠ صفحات فقط من الكتاب الالكتروني، لقراءة الكتاب كاملا اضغط على الزر “اشتر الآن"

‏اللغة: English
Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 156, Jan. 8, 1919

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 156, Jan. 8, 1919

تقييمك:
0
No votes yet
المؤلف:
دار النشر: Project Gutenberg
الصفحة رقم: 5

BUTT has been unanimously elected Empress of Patagonia.

Sir THOMAS BEECHAM'S selection from among the candidates for the throne of New Guinea, is regarded as a foregone conclusion. The famous violinist, Mr. ALBERT SAMMONS, has so far returned no final answer to the offer of the Crown of Sordinia, but it is believed that he cannot long remain mute to the touching appeal of the signatories. A favourable answer is also expected from Mlle. Jelly Aranyi, who has been nominated Queen of Guava.

On the other hand Sir EDWARD ELGAR, O.M., has steadfastly declined the Tsardom of Bulgaria, even though it was proposed to change the name of the country to Elgaria.


Milliner. "HOW DOES MODOM LIKE THIS LITTLE BIRD OF PARADISE MODEL? IT BECOMES MODOM VERY WELL."

Customer. "YES, IT IS RATHER NICE, BUT (remembers her obligations as a mother) HOW MANY COUPONS?"


TO AN EGYPTIAN BOY.

Child of the gorgeous East, whose ardent suns

Have kissed thy velvet skin to deeper lustre

And given thine almond eyes

A look more calm and wise

Than any we pale Westerners can muster,

Alas! my mean intelligence affords

No clue to grasp the meaning of the words

Which vehemently from thy larynx leap.

How is it that the liquid language runs?

"Naisoringtrîferwonbiasterferishîp."

E'en so, methinks, did CLEOPATRA WOO

Her vanquished victor, couched on scented roses,

And PHARAOH from his throne

With more imperious tone

Addressed in some such terms rebellious MOSES;

And esoteric priests in Theban shrines,

Their ritual conned from hieroglyphic signs,

Thus muttered incantations dark and deep

To Isis and Osiris, Thoth and Shu:

"Naisoringtrîferwonbiasterferishîp."

In all my youthful studies why was this

Left out? What tutor shall I blame my folly on?

From Sekhet-Hetepu

Return to mortal view,

O shade of BRUGSCH or MARIETTE or CHAMPOLLION;

Expound the message latent in his speech

Or send a clearer medium, I beseech;

For lo! I listen till I almost weep

For anguish at the priceless gems I miss:

"Naisoringtrîferwonbiasterferishîp."

To sundry greenish orbs arranged on trays—

Unripe, unluscious fruit—he draws attention.

My mind, till now so dark,

Receives a sudden spark

That glows and flames to perfect comprehension;

And I, whom no Rosetta Stone assists,

Become the peer of Egyptologists,

From whom exotic tongues no secrets keep;

For this is what the alien blighter says:

"Nice orang'; three for one piastre; very cheap."


"Napoleon was crowned Emperor of the French on December 2nd, 1804, and abdicated in 1914. On December 2nd, 1918, the papers announced the formal abdication of Wilhelm II. of Germany."—Kent Messenger.

WILHELM probably wishes that he had chosen the same date for his abdication as NAPOLEON.


When a dear little lady from Lancashire

Came to London to act as a bank cashier,

And asked, "Is it true

1 + 1 = 2?"

They thought they'd revert to a man cashier.



THE BABES IN THE WOOD.

THE OLD LIBERAL NURSERY (moribund but sanguine). "NO MATTER—A TIME WILL COME!"


PARLIAMENTARY CASUALTIES.

Dear Mr. Punch,—I am told that Mr. ASQUITH considers that this has been a most unsatisfactory election. So do I. As you know, the principal function of the House of Commons nowadays is to provide amusing "copy" for the late editions of the evening papers and to give the "sketch"-writers a chance of exercising their pretty wits. As Mr. SPENCER LEIGH HUGHES once remarked in an after-dinner speech to Mr. BALFOUR, "You, Sir, are our raw material."

Now, what I complain of is that on the present occasion the voters have entirely disregarded the needs of the journeymen of the Press, and have ruthlessly deprived them of the greater part of their raw material. Mr. HUGHES himself, I am glad to see, has been spared, but he fortunately had not to undergo the hazards of a contest. I tremble to think what his fate might have been if at the last moment some stodgy statesman had been nominated to oppose him.

Against humour, conscious or unconscious, the voters seem to have solidly set their faces. It was bad enough that Mr. JOE KING—who has probably helped to provide more deserving journalists with a living than any other legislator who ever lived—should have declined the contest. Question-time without Mr. KING and his unerring nose for mare's-nests will be like Alice without The Mad Hatter. It was bad, too, that Sir HEDWORTH MEUX should have decided to interrupt the flow of that eloquence which we were forbidden to call "breezy," and that Major "Boadicea" HUNT, Mr. JOHN BURNS, Mr. TIM HEALY, and Mr. SWIFT MACNEILL should have withdrawn from a scene in which they had provided so much profitable entertainment for the gods in the Press Gallery.

These losses made it all the more incumbent upon the electors to see that the House should retain as much as possible of the remnant of its comic relief. But what do we find? Why, that practically every one of the gentlemen who made the journalist's life worth living in the last Parliament has been cruelly turned down.

For much of this grief the Sinn Feiners are responsible. They have easily accomplished what a few years ago six stalwart British constables could scarcely do and have removed the gigantic Mr. FLAVIN from his emerald bench. With him have gone nearly all his comrades; and the once-powerful Nationalist party, which for nearly forty years has been such an unfailing source of sparkling paragraphs, is reduced to the number immortalised by WORDSWORTH'S little maid.

Almost more distressing than the loss of individuals is the breaking up of Parliamentary partnerships. What is the use of Mr. HOUSTON being returned if he has no longer Sir LEO CHIOZZA MONEY to heckle? Captain PRETYMAN-NEWMAN will doubtless continue to ask questions about the shocking condition of his native country, but without Mr. REDDY'S squeaking obbligato, "Why isn't the honourable and gallant Member out at the Front?" they will lose half their savour. He will be as dull as Io without her gad-fly. Mr. "Boanerges" STANTON is happily still with us, but with no pacifists to bellow at I fear that his vocal chords will atrophy.

Then the famous Young Scots Trio, which has given us so many attractive "turns," has been violently dissolved. Mr. PRINGLE, whose ample supply of vitriolic invective

Pages