href="@public@vhost@g@gutenberg@html@files@34823@[email protected]#Page_131" class="pginternal" tag="{http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml}a">131-132
| Will dodo-bones circulate? Dodo-bones and poker chips; circular reasoning |
132 |
| Both medium of exchange and standard of value must be valuable |
133 |
| Is inconvertible paper an exception? |
133-134 |
| Doctrine that money gives legal claim to things in general |
134 |
| Kemmerer's assumptions; money made of commodity, once valuable, now used only as money |
135 |
| Commodity theory requires present commodity value |
135 |
| Historical vs. cross-section view: possibility that such money would circulate |
135-136 |
| Value not tied up with marginal utility or commodities: social value theory; derived values often become independent of original presuppositions, in economic as well as legal and moral spheres |
136-139 |
| But this no basis for quantity theory: social psychology, not mechanics |
139 |
| "Banker's psychology" vs. psychology of blind habit: India, Austria, United States; monetary phenomena of war times; "credit theory" of Greenbacks |
139-142 |
| Question-begging definitions |
142-143 |
| Assumptions of quantity theory: blind habit and fluid prices |
143-144 |
| Extreme commodity theory denies that money-use adds to value of money; usually not true; analysis of money-functions |
144-150 |
| Hypothetical case in which whole value of money comes from commodity value |
150-152 |
| Money must have value apart from monetary employments, but, in general, gains additional value from employment as money |
152-153 |
| |
CHAPTER VIII THE "EQUATION OF EXCHANGE" |
| Fisher leading, most consistent, most uncompromising quantity theorist: wide acceptance of his views |
154 |
| Taussig vs. Fisher |
155 |
| Fisher and dodo-bone doctrine: logical part of quantity theory; Fisher's value concept |
155-156 |
| "Equation of exchange": analysis of Fisher's version, typical of all |
156-171 |
| In what sense equality between two sides of equation? Meaning of "T" |
158-161 |
| No "goods side" to equation; both sides sums of money; equal because identical; equation meaningless |
161-162 |
| All factors in equation highly abstract |
162-163 |
| "P" and "T" cannot both be given independent definitions: P defined as weighted average, with T in denominator; and must be changed from year to year, as elements in T change, even though no prices change |
164-166 |
| This makes circular theory: problem defined in terms of explanation |
165-166 |
| Causal theory associated with equation of exchange |
166 |
| Equation amplified to include credit; not acceptable to Nicholson or Walker, and caricature of conditions in Germany and France |
public@vhost@g@gutenberg@html@files@34823@[email protected]#Page_166" class="pginternal"
|