occasional daytime forays seem to occur almost always in animals driven by hunger on winter days, when the temperature has suddenly risen after periods of severely cold weather that have imposed inactivity and fasting.

Earlier field studies of the opossum have produced somewhat conflicting evidence and conclusions regarding the extent and manner of the opossum's travels. Lay (1942:158) live-trapped and marked 117 opossums on an 86-acre study area in eastern Texas over a two-year period and caught 29 of them at three or more different trapping stations. He found that "The average minimum area between the stations in these 29 home ranges was 11.5 acres. The mean of the greatest distances traveled between stations was 1460 feet, which would form a theoretical circle of 38.4 acres.... Separate individual territories are not important to opossums as home ranges overlapped in every instance." Reynolds, in central Missouri, concluded that: "The subsequent recovery of only 5 of 68 released animals, the reported capture of one individual 7 miles from the point of release nine months later, and the rapid repopulation of an area devoid of opossums at the close of the hunting season indicate that most opossums are nomadic." In southeastern Iowa, Wisemann and Hendrickson (1950:336) found that: "Recaptures, in 1942, of three opossums tagged in 1941 indicated a yearly mobility of one-fourth mile; four tagged in 1942 were recaptured within one-half mile from sites of tagging."

Opossums, like other animals, obviously make various types of movements. Ordinarily one tends to keep within a relatively small area that is familiar to it and that satisfies all its ecological requirements. This constitutes its home range. Many other animals, including various mammals, are characterized by territoriality; individuals, pairs or groups occupy definite areas, defended as territories, to the exclusion of other members of their species. Like Lay (loc. cit.) we found no evidence of territoriality in the opossum. In general, opossums are unsocial but not intolerant in their behavior. In the present study numerous individuals of both sexes and various sizes and ages were found to be occupying the same area simultaneously, with overlapping but no exact correspondence in home ranges. Occasionally two or more opossums may use the same den, but each goes its own way on its foraging and it seems that no sociability is involved.

On many occasions opossums were tracked in soft snow or mud which retained footprints. Under conditions prevailing locally, it was difficult to follow such a trail for any great distance but trailing did divulge information concerning the type of route followed and the method of foraging. Opossums were found to have little inclination to follow beaten trails, either their own or those of other animals. A foraging opossum moved about in an extremely circuitous and erratic route, seldom taking more than a few steps without a change of direction, and frequently crossing its own course in a series of loops, some only a few feet or a few inches in diameter. In moving about, it is guided partly by the tactile and olfactory stimuli of objects on or beneath the ground surface which are potential food sources. Foraging consists of a succession of tests of such objects, as the animal moves from one to another. Opossums may habitually follow intermittent creeks or gullies or even roads when these provide better foraging than does the adjoining habitat. Metamorphosing amphibians may provide such a food source along a creek and the supply of crushed insects or other small animals along a road attracts the opossum. Food is found by turning chips and leaves, and by poking and probing in chinks and crevices with its snout and paws. On a few occasions short, well worn trails made by opossums were found, from dens to near-by feeding areas where grape tangles provided an abundant and readily available food source over periods of weeks. More often, an opossum follows no trail in its search for food, but seems to wander at random within its home range.

Figure 4. Quarter-mile-square areas on Reservation showing dates and successive sites of capture of individual opossums; (A) subadult male; (B) subadult male; (C) subadult male; (D) adult female. Arrows from circles show courses that were taken by released opossums that were followed; crosses show location of dens to which they were traced.

Evidence of the existence and extent of home range was obtained for those opossums that were trapped on several or many occasions. Records of each were usually well scattered over an area hundreds of feet in diameter. Limits of home ranges are not sharply defined and at any time the opossum may extend its range into new areas. It may shift to a new den from which areas beyond its original home range are readily accessible, and may then occupy a new home range overlapping part of the old one. Or, it may make a relatively long shift, to an area entirely distinct from the original home range and well separated from it. That such shifts are frequent was indicated by the brief span of records for most of the opossums live-trapped on the Reservation. After the first capture and marking an individual was often caught consistently over periods of weeks, only to drop out suddenly either having been eliminated or having moved elsewhere. Of the 111 opossums marked and released, 62 were caught only once and 25 others were recaptured only within a period of one or two months. Relatively few, only 24 (14 males and 10 females), had records extending over more than two months. Many of the opossums trapped were probably at or near the edges of their home ranges which barely overlapped the study area; consequently the chances of recapturing them were poor. Those caught well within the trapping area were much more likely to be recaptured.

Tracking of opossums suggested that having once left the home den, an animal ordinarily did not return until it had finished its nightly foraging, and wandered more or less at random over its home range. Successive capture sites for any one opossum might be near together or far apart with respect to its over-all range, but on the average, they would be separated by approximately half the breadth of the home range assuming the animal's activity to be evenly distributed over the whole area. Each of twenty-two opossums was caught at only two different trapping stations. For this group, the average distance between stations was 761 feet (657 feet for seven males and 810 feet for 15 females) indicating home ranges of approximately 42 acres in extent. Each of ten opossums was caught at three different stations; for these the distances between the first and second stations, between the first and third and between the second and third comprise three distinct movement records, and the average of all three probably affords a more reliable figure for the radius of the home range than does the single movement available for each of the 22 animals captured at only two stations. For these average individual movements the mean of this whole group of 10 was 841.5 feet. Each of five opossums was taken at 4 different trapping stations, and for each of these a record of six different movements was available. The average was 1016 feet. For the 37 opossums caught at two, three or four different trapping stations, the mean distance was 817 feet; this is an indication of home ranges of approximately 48 acres in extent. Each of thirteen opossums was caught at five or more trapping stations. The distribution of these stations affords a crude idea of the extent and position of each animal's home range, but ordinarily it might be expected that the area included between capture sites would be less than the animal's actual home range, because relatively few of the sites of capture would be on the margin of the home range. For this group, maximum distances between trapping stations averaged 1954 feet suggesting a home range of nearly 70 acres, larger than that computed for the opossums caught at only two, three, or four stations. However, for those caught at five or more stations, the time involved averaged longer and probably some had altered their ranges to invade new areas. Ranges may have been broadly oval rather than circular so that the maximum diameter measured between stations exceeded somewhat the average range diameter for each animal.

The opossums having home ranges entirely within the study area were those most likely to be caught repeatedly and at different locations, while those with ranges centering near the edge of the area, or outside of it tended to be caught at fewer locations and less frequently. For those animals with ranges partly outside the study area, the captures recorded would represent only one sector of the home range and would tend to be near together, so that many of the radii computed for individual home ranges are too small. Each average figure for home range is perhaps erroneously low for this reason. The error tends to be greatest for those taken at only two locations, and least for those trapped at the greatest number of different locations.

Approximate size of the usual home range is apparent from the several figures although various unknown or unmeasurable factors distort the data. The usual home range of the opossum in the area of the study is in the neighborhood of 50 acres or a little less. With the data available no significant differences in sizes of home ranges are discernible between males and females nor between adults and young of the year. Shifts occur frequently, contributing to population turnover, which may result in almost complete replacement of individuals in the course of a year's time, on an area of less than a square mile.

One hundred and fifteen small young of 14 different litters were marked while still attached to the mother's teats in the pouches. A fairly high rate of mortality probably is normal in the small dependent young and further mortality probably resulted from the deleterious effects of examining and handling them and the females that carried them. At any rate, 47 of 208 young recorded, were missing at subsequent recaptures of the females, before the young were old enough to become independent. It is almost certain that the actual losses were much higher, because the records for each female cover only part of the period during which young are carried in the pouch.

Fifteen of these marked young of seven different litters were recaptured after periods of months, when they were well grown or adult and the locations of these recaptures afford information concerning the animals' dispersal. Their records are summarized below. Opossums that wandered much more than half a mile or at most three-fourths of a mile from the place of original capture were unlikely to be recaptured, and some originally recorded at sites near the edge of the study area might have moved beyond its boundary with much shorter shifts.

Most of these opossums were recaptured within a year of the time they were marked as small young in the females' pouches, and on the average they had moved a little less than 400 yards. While the sex ratio was equal in the pouch young that were marked, it is noteworthy that all but two of the recaptured opossums were females; and of the two males, one was recaptured early, before it could have had time to wander far. The young males, after becoming independent must tend to wander much more widely, and to settle in new areas far removed from the mother's home range. It is unlikely that this dispersal of the young males is motivated either by rivalry and intolerance of larger males or by sexual drive. The dispersal occurs in late summer when there is no breeding activity, and when food is present in greatest abundance and variety.

The feeding habits of the opossum in Douglas County, northeastern Kansas, have been discussed by Sandidge (1953). His data were obtained from stomach analysis of specimens caught in steel traps. In the present study no stomachs were available for analysis as the opossums on the Reservation were not sacrificed for this purpose and effort was made to avoid mortality in those that were live-trapped. Information concerning their feeding habits was obtained mainly by examination of scats in the field. On this 590-acre tract maintained as a Natural Area with human disturbance kept to a minimum, the available food sources differed somewhat from those of other woodland areas and especially from those of cultivated or suburban areas as reported upon by Sandidge.

The feces or "scats" of the opossum are not liable to be confused with those of other mammals except possibly with those of the striped skunk or raccoon, both relatively uncommon on the Reservation. Favorite sites for