exhibiting a decrease in relation to the total of population for one year only of the decade, and on the whole a steady increase for the whole twenty years.

It further appears from the tables of statistics, that the number of insane paupers per 100,000 of the population, which was one hundred and fifty-seven (157), January 1, 1858, advanced to two hundred and seventeen (217) per 100,000, January 1, 1880, notwithstanding the fact, that during this period the number of pauper-persons per 100,000 of the general population diminished from two thousand six hundred and thirty (2,630) to one thousand seven hundred and eighteen (1,718).

It thus appears that insanity is, both absolutely and relatively, a much larger element in the pauperism of the country than ever before.

In considering the force of the above statistics there is one element which may, I think, properly be referred to as entering into the calculation, to which I have nowhere found any allusion, namely,—that of emigration. I have not at hand the statistics to show how great this has been from England and Scotland during the last twenty years, but we know that it has been very considerable from both countries to Canada, Australia, and the United States; and I think it fair to assume that this emigration has generally been from those who have been in good mental health, at least at the time of leaving these countries; and if at this time they had relatives who were insane, these would be left behind. Therefore, so far as this would have an effect upon the statistics of insanity, it would be toward exhibiting a higher ratio of the insane to the whole population than would otherwise appear.

Having made due allowance for this, and other considerations, which were alluded to in connection with the statistics of asylums, I still think the evidence all points toward a large increase of insanity, both absolute and relatively to the population, in both England and Scotland.

At the time of this writing, the statistics of the census for 1880, for the United States, have not been so far completed and published, that evidence from them can here be presented, but I think there can be no doubt that, when they appear, they will tend to confirm very strongly those already presented, which have been prepared with so great care, and collected under such very favorable conditions, and which demonstrate, or so nearly demonstrate, both the absolute and relative increase of insanity.

INSANITY AND CIVILIZATION.

CHAPTER III.

INSANITY AND CIVILIZATION.

Information in reference to the character of the diseases which formerly existed among the aborigines of North America, or among uncivilized peoples of other countries, in the past, is both meagre and indefinite. Legends concerning widespread epidemics of some forms of disease, especially the yellow fever and small-pox, among those tribes which formerly lived on the territory which now constitutes New England, have been handed down, and there must have occurred cases of insanity, to a greater or less extent, among all savage nations, arising from injuries to some portion of the nervous system; but, for the most part, those conditions and experiences of life which appear to predispose or excite the nervous system into diseased action, were probably absent.

Those who were born with weakened or defective organizations, either physical or mental, would, under the exposed conditions and the rude experiences of uncivilized life, hardly attain to adult age, even if they were not intentionally left to perish, so that the vast majority of those who did arrive at those periods of life during which insanity generally manifests itself, would probably possess such nervous organizations as would be little liable to become insane.

Their modes of living, also, being for the most part in the open air, and without excessive labor or exertion, except on occasions, and during short periods; and living in comparative freedom concerning those uncertainties of business and property which exist so generally among some classes, and even nations, under the conditions of civilized life; having few needs, and those of such a nature as to be easily supplied, would all be unfavorable to the development of insanity.

Again, uncivilized persons have but little sensitiveness, and are easily satisfied in reference to that long range of sentiment and feeling which holds so large a sway, and wields so strong an influence, in the lives of their brethern and sisters in civilized life; and, moreover, experience few of the annoyances, disappointments, and vexations which result from the habits and customs of our forms of domestic and business conditions.

Yet it appears to be a humiliating admission to make, that, with all the increase of mental power and range of thought, with acquired power over the forces of nature, with ability to convert the hidden treasures and forces of nature, into the means of supplying wants and ministering to comfort, and, with the vast storehouse of mental wealth which comes into the possession of mankind through the influences of civilization, there should, somehow, necessarily come with them, greater liability to such a calamity as insanity. This is, however, but one of many evils which invariably come into existence under the changed relations and circumstances of life, not only while passing from the habits of uncivilized life to those of a high state of civilization, but especially while living in the latter condition.

It is exceedingly difficult to differentiate, and accurately state in few words, what is signified by either insanity or civilization. Both are terms, the general signification of which, for practical purposes, is supposed to be well enough understood, but when we are called upon to give a clear and at the same time a fully comprehensive definition of them, there is much difficulty in doing it.

As has been very clearly shown by Dr. Arthur Mitchell,[2] civilizations may differ in different countries, as well as at different periods of time in the same country; they may be old or new, high or low, one thing in this century, and another in the next. That of the ancient Greek certainly differed widely from that of the Roman, while both differed largely from the European civilization of the present time.

In one view of the subject, that which regards it as something