You are here

قراءة كتاب The Pocket Gophers (Genus Thomomys) of Utah University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, Vol. 1 No. 1

تنويه: تعرض هنا نبذة من اول ١٠ صفحات فقط من الكتاب الالكتروني، لقراءة الكتاب كاملا اضغط على الزر “اشتر الآن"

‏اللغة: English
The Pocket Gophers (Genus Thomomys) of Utah
University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, Vol. 1 No. 1

The Pocket Gophers (Genus Thomomys) of Utah University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, Vol. 1 No. 1

تقييمك:
0
No votes yet
المؤلف:
دار النشر: Project Gutenberg
الصفحة رقم: 2

Thomomys talpoides bulbivorus, using the name umbrinus for the animals of only southern Utah (Coues, 1877:627, 628). The two names Thomomys bottae and Thomomys talpoides, now applicable to gophers in Utah, were synonomized under the name Thomomys talpoides bulbivorus by Coues (1875:256; 1877:627). After this beginning only three other papers, all by J. A. Allen, appeared in the next twenty years. They were reports on collections of mammals made by Walter W. Granger and Charles P. Rowley. One of these contained the description of Thomomys aureus. Likewise, in the ensuing twenty years there were only three papers, one in 1901 by C. Hart Merriam in which he described Thomomys uinta, one by Allen (1905:119), and Vernon Bailey's (1915) "Revision of the pocket gophers of the genus Thomomys" in which he summarized the information then available on these animals within the state. Barnes (1922 and 1927) reprinted the information summarized by Bailey. Since 1927 approximately twenty-five papers, mostly taxonomic, have been published in which reference is made to Utah gophers, and especially since 1930 much information has been accumulated about the distribution and speciation of this genus within the state.

Specimens to the number of 1,045 have been available for this study. Whereas Bailey (loc. cit.) listed only four kinds belonging to four different species, thirty-five kinds are now known from Utah. Seven of these are herein described as new. The thirty-five kinds are found to belong to only two instead of four full species.

Inasmuch as the literature is scattered and since names have been applied in different ways at different times, I have attempted to give a synonomy as complete as possible for each form found within the state.

The bibliographies of Hayward (1936 and 1941) and Miller's (1924) "List of North American mammals" have been of great use.

Capitalized color terms in the accounts are after Ridgway, Color Standards and Color Nomenclature, Washington, D. C., 1912.

In the lists of specimens examined, the localities are listed by counties from west to east, beginning at the northwestern corner of the state, and within each county from north to south. When two localities are on the same latitude, the westernmost is listed first.

I am deeply indebted to Professor R. V. Chamberlin, of the University of Utah, for encouragement and support in my investigation. I also acknowledge critical assistance in the preparation of this paper from Professor E. Raymond Hall of the University of Kansas. For the loan of specimens I am grateful to the following: Clinton G. Abbott and Lawrence M. Huey, Natural History Museum of San Diego, San Diego, California; Harold E. Anthony and J. Eric Hill, American Museum of Natural History, New York City, New York; Seth B. Benson, Museum of Vertebrate Zoölogy, University of California, Berkeley, California; William H. Burt, Museum of Zoölogy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; J. Kenneth Doutt, Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Ross Hardy, Dixie Junior College, St. George, Utah; C. Lynn Hayward and Vasco M. Tanner, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; H. H. T. Jackson and Viola S. Schantz, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, U. S. National Museum, Washington, D. C.; Remington Kellogg and Alexander Wetmore, U. S. National Museum, Washington, D. C.; J. S. Stanford, Utah State Agricultural College, Logan, Utah.

Unless otherwise indicated, specimens are in the Museum of Zoölogy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. In lists of specimens examined, abbreviations are employed as follows:

(A. M. N. H.) American Museum of Natural History.
(N. H. M. S. D.) Natural History Museum of San Diego.
(M. V. Z.) Museum of Vertebrate Zoölogy, University of California.
(U. M.) Museum of Zoölogy, University of Michigan.
(C. M.) Carnegie Museum.
(R. H.) Collection of Ross Hardy.
(B. Y. U.) Brigham Young University.
(U. S. N. M.) United States National Museum.
(U. S. A. C.) Utah State Agricultural College.
(K. U.) Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas.

Fig. 1. Map showing the distribution of species and subspecies of pocket gophers in Utah. FIG. 1. Map showing the distribution of species and subspecies of pocket gophers in Utah.

Guide to subspecies: 12. T. b. aureiventris 24. T. b. lenis
1. T. t. gracilis 13. T. b. robustus 25. T. b. levidensis
2. T. t. wasatchensis 14. T. b. minimus 26. T. b. osgoodi
3. T. t. oquirrhensis 15. T. b. nesophilus 27. T. b. howelli
4. T. t. uinta 16. T. b. stansburyi 28. T. b. wahwahensis
5. T. t. pygmaeus 17. T. b. albicaudatus 29. T. b. dissimilis
6. T. t. ravus 18. T. b. bonnevillei 30. T. b. aureus
7. T. t. ocius 19. T. b. centralis 31. T. b. birdseyei
8. T. t. moorei 20. T. b. sevieri 32. T. b. virgineus
9. T. t. fossor 21. T. b. convexus 33. T. b. planirostris
10. T. t. parowanensis 22. T. b. tivius 34. T. b. absonus
11. T. t. levis 23. T. b. contractus 35. T. b. alexandrae

Genus Thomomys Wied

All pocket gophers of Utah belong to the genus Thomomys. There are only two species within the state, Thomomys bottae with twenty-four subspecies and Thomomys talpoides with eleven subspecies.

Due to marked mutational capacities and ready response to environmental pressures and sedentary habits, pocket gophers differentiate readily into numerous subspecies. It is well known

Pages