tag="{http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml}a">388

Fig. 1. Proechimys dimidiatus (Günther). Live female on left and male on right. × ½. From Tingua, Nova Iguassú, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Photographed in spring (August or September) of 1942 by author.

INTRODUCTION

The spiny-rats included in the genus Proechimys are common in almost every forest of South America above the Tropic of Capricorn, and in Central America northward to approximately 12° N, in Nicaragua. In size and proportions they are similar to the brown rat Rattus norvegicus but actually they belong to a very different suborder of rodents—the Hystricomorpha. The hystricomorphs are represented in South America by a large variety of animals, of which capybaras, agoutis and cavies are common representatives.

The pelage of the spiny-rats has a large number of flattened, spinelike hairs, especially on the back. The color ranges through different tints and shades of reddish-brown more or less evenly distributed on the upper parts; the underparts are usually pure white, sharply contrasting with the brown color above. The tail is bicolored, brown above and white below.

The spiny-rats live in forests of different types, generally in the proximity of water. Shelter is usually procured under boulders, stumps or masses of roots. The reproductive rate is low; on the average, there are only two young per litter and only two litters per year.

Sixty-odd names have been given to species and subspecies of Proechimys in the last hundred and fifty years and no serious revision of the taxonomy of the genus was undertaken in the last century. The purpose of the present work is to provide means of understanding species and subspecies within the genus and to describe the different kinds known to occur within the confines of Brazil.

METHODS AND TERMINOLOGY

Pelage.—It was found advisable to use a standardized nomenclature for hairs. The names here proposed are a choice of those used in the literature, with the suffix "form" as an element of uniformity. I feel that it would be advantageous if everyone adopted a similar universal system in mammalogy.

The names listed below are used as nouns and are considered as English versions which could easily be adapted to different languages. These names may be complemented with adjectives as needed. Examples are lanceolate aristiforms, spinous aristiforms, and woolly setiforms.

Aristiforms: The most conspicuously developed hairs in a three-layered pelage or the corresponding hairs in a simpler pelage. Names previously used for these hairs are: guard hair, leithaar and jarre.

Setiforms: Common to all species and most numerous throughout the pelage; second in conspicuousness, being the dominant hairs in the middle layer. Synonyms are: over hairs, grannenhaare and soies.

Villiforms: The smallest hairs in the three-layered pelage. Synonyms are: underfur, wollhaar and duvet.

Vibrissiforms: The vibrissae proper, or any typically sensory hair.

Teeth.—The tritubercular nomenclature was abandoned because of overwhelming difficulties; more research on the Hystricomorpha is certainly needed before the tritubercular nomenclature can be applied with confidence. The following names are used for features of the molariform teeth:

Main fold: The inner or lingual fold in the upper molariform teeth and outer or labial fold in the lower molariform teeth.

Counterfold: Any outer or labial fold in the upper or any inner or lingual fold in the lower molariform teeth.

For incisors Thomas (1921:141) is followed: opisthodont, orthodont and proodont depending on the angle between the exposed part of incisors and the ventral surface of the rostrum.

The capital letters P and M designate premolars and molars, respectively, of the upper jaws; lower case letters p and m designate corresponding teeth in the lower jaws.

Measurements.—Measurements of skins were used only when provided by the collector. The length of the hind-foot is intended to be always cum unguis, but in a few instances it is impossible to be sure whether the collector included the nail. Length of tail was used only when the tail seemed not to be mutilated. Ear measurements taken by collectors are scarce. In spite of the apparent usefulness of length of ear, it was found to be inadvisable to take the measurement on the dry skins.