valign="top">    Section VI. Transcendental Idealism as the Key to the Solution of the Cosmological Dialectic

503     Section VII. Critical Decision of the Cosmological Conflict of Reason with itself 504     Section VIII. The Regulative Principle of Pure Reason in regard to the Cosmological Ideas 506     Section IX. The Empirical Employment of the Regulative Principles of Reason in regard to all Cosmological Ideas 508       Solution of the First and Second Antinomies 508       Remarks on the Distinction between the Mathematical-Transcendental and the Dynamical-Transcendental Ideas 510       Comment on Kant’s Method of Argument 510       Solution of the Third Antinomy 512       Possibility of harmonising Causality through Freedom with the Universal Law of Natural Necessity 513       Explanation of the Relation of Freedom to Necessity of Nature 514       Comment on Kant’s Method of Argument 517       Solution of the Fourth Antinomy 518       Concluding Note on the whole Antinomy of Pure Reason 519       Concluding Comment on Kant’s Doctrine of the Antinomies 519   Chapter III. The Ideal of Pure Reason 522     Section I. and II. The Transcendental Ideal 522       Comment on Kant’s Method of Argument 524     Section III. The Speculative Arguments in Proof of the Existence of a Supreme Being 525     Section IV. The Impossibility of an Ontological Proof 527       Comment on Kant’s Method of Argument 528     Section V. The Impossibility of a Cosmological Proof of the Existence of God 531       Comment on Kant’s Method of Argument 533       Discovery and Explanation of the Transcendental Illusion in all Transcendental Proof of the Existence of a necessary Being 534       Comment on Kant’s Method of Argument 535     Section VI. The Impossibility of the Physico-Theological Proof 538     Section VII. Criticism of all Theology based on speculative Principles of Reason 541       Concluding Comment 541