You are here
قراءة كتاب The Principles of Stratigraphical Geology
تنويه: تعرض هنا نبذة من اول ١٠ صفحات فقط من الكتاب الالكتروني، لقراءة الكتاب كاملا اضغط على الزر “اشتر الآن"
href="@public@vhost@g@gutenberg@html@files@43963@[email protected]#Footnote_5_5" class="fnanchor pginternal" tag="{http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml}a">[5]."
[3] Memoir of William Smith, p. 142.
[4] Ibid. p. 141.
[5] The work of Smith which directly bears upon the establishment of the law of identification of strata by included organisms is published in two treatises, entitled:—
(i) Strata identified by Organized Fossils, 4to. (intended to comprise seven parts, of which four only were published), commenced in 1816.
(ii) A Stratigraphical System of Organized Fossils, compiled from the original Geological Collection deposited in the British Museum. 4to. 1817.
William Smith seems to have recognised intuitively the truth of a law which was but dimly understood before his time,—the law of superposition, which may be thus stated: "of any two strata, the one which was originally the lower, is the older." This may appear self-evident but it was certainly not so. As the result of this recognition he established the second great stratigraphical law, with which his name will ever be linked, that strata are identifiable by their included organisms.
Before Smith's time, geological maps were lithological rather than stratigraphical, they represented the different kinds of rocks seen upon the surface without regard to their age; since Smith revolutionised geology, the maps of a country composed largely of stratified rocks are essentially stratigraphical, but partly no doubt on account of adherence to old custom, partly on economic grounds, the majority of our stratigraphical maps are lithological rather than palæontological, that is the subdivisions of the strata represented upon the map are chosen rather on account of lithological peculiarities than because of the variations in their enclosed organisms. It is hardly likely that Government surveys will be allowed to publish palæontological maps, which will be almost exclusively of theoretical interest, and it remains for zealous private individuals to accomplish the production of such maps. When they are produced, a comparison of stratigraphical maps founded on lithological and palæontological considerations will furnish results of extreme scientific interest.
Turning now from Smith's contributions to the science as a whole, we may now consider what he did for British geology. His geological map was published in 1815 and was described as follows:—"A Geological Map of England and Wales, with part of Scotland; exhibiting the Collieries, Mines, and Canals, the Marshes and Fen Lands originally overflowed by the Sea, and the varieties of Soil, according to the variations of the Substrata; illustrated by the most descriptive Names of Places and of Local Districts; showing also the Rivers, Sites of Parks, and principal Seats of the Nobility and Gentry, and the opposite Coast of France. By William Smith, Mineral Surveyor." The map was originally on the scale of five miles to an inch. In 1819 a reduced map was published, and in later years a series of county maps. He also published several geological sections, including one (in 1819) showing the strata from London to Snowdon.
The student should compare Smith's map of the strata with one published in modern times in order to see how accurate was Smith's delineation of the outcrop of the later deposits of our island.
The following table, taken from Phillips' memoir, p. 146, is also of interest as showing the development of Smith's work and the completeness of his classification in his later years, and as illustrating how much we are indebted to Smith for our present nomenclature, so much so that as Prof. Sedgwick remarked when presenting the first Wollaston Medal of the Geological Society to Smith, "If in the pride of our present strength, we were disposed to forget our origin, our very speech would bewray us: for we use the language which he taught us in the infancy of our science. If we, by our united efforts, are chiselling the ornaments and slowly raising up the pinnacles of one of the temples of nature, it was he who gave the plan, and laid the foundations, and erected a portion of the solid walls by the unassisted labour of his hands."[6]
[6] The reader may consult an interesting paper by Professor Judd, on "William Smith's Manuscript Maps," Geological Magazine, Decade IV. vol. IV. (1897) p. 439.
Comparative View of the Names and Succession of the Strata.
Table drawn up in 1799. | Table accompanying the map, drawn up in 1812. | Improved table drawn up in 1815 and 1816 after the first copies of the map had been issued. | ||||||||
London Clay | 1 | London Clay | ||||||||
Clay or Brick-earth | 2 | Sand | ||||||||
3 | Crag | |||||||||
Sand or light loam | 4 | Sand | ||||||||
1 | Chalk | Chalk | 5 |
|
||||||
2 | Sand | Green Sand | 6 | Green Sand | ||||||
Blue Marl | 7 | Brick Earth | ||||||||
Purbeck Stone, Kentish Rag and Limestone of the vales of Pickering and Aylesbury, Iron Sand and Carstone | ![]() |
8 | Sand | |||||||
9 | Portland Rock | |||||||||
10 | Sand | |||||||||
11 | Oaktree Clay | |||||||||
12 | Coral Rag and |