Eight Sermons
ON
THE PRIESTHOOD, ALTAR, AND
SACRIFICE.

BY
MAYOW WYNELL MAYOW, M.A.,

PERPETUAL CURATE OF ST. MARY’S, WEST BROMPTON, AND LATE
STUDENT OF CHRIST CHURCH, OXFORD.

“The principles of Christianity are now as freely questioned as the most doubtful and controverted points; the grounds of faith are as safely denied as the most unnecessary superstructions; that religion hath the greatest advantage which appeareth in the newest dress, as if we looked for another faith to be delivered to the saints: whereas in Christianity there can be no concerning truth which is not ancient, and whatsoever is truly new, is certainly false.”—(Bp. Pearson on the Creed: Epistle Dedicatory.)

Oxford and London:
JAMES PARKER AND CO.
1867.

TO THE
RIGHT REV. FATHER IN GOD,
WALTER KERR,
LORD BISHOP OF SALISBURY,
IN GRATEFUL REMEMBRANCE OF A CONNECTION WITH HIS
DIOCESE FOR NEARLY A QUARTER OF A CENTURY,
AS A TOKEN OF REVERENCE FOR HIS OFFICE, AND UNFEIGNED
RESPECT FOR HIS CHARACTER,
AS SOME LITTLE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF MANY
KINDNESSES RECEIVED,
AND AS A HUMBLE TRIBUTE TO HIS CONSTANCY
IN DEFENDING THE FAITH IN
THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND,

This Volume

IS (BY PERMISSION) INSCRIBED,
BY HIS LORDSHIP’S VERY FAITHFUL AND GRATEFUL SERVANT,

M. W. MAYOW.

ADVERTISEMENT.

The following Sermons were preached at St. Mary’s, West Brompton, in November and December, 1866.  They are now printed as a humble contribution towards the defence of the Catholic doctrine of the priesthood, the altar, and the sacrifice, in days when there seem no limits to assault upon it, when there prevails every conceivable confusion between what is Catholic and what is Roman, and when there is the widest misapprehension of the principles of our Reformation.  If this small volume should contribute in any way to a better understanding of those principles, and to the vindication of the loyalty to our own Church of such as, maintaining its Catholic character, desire equally to be loyal to the Church Universal, (and believe in truth that there is no antagonism between them,) it will not, I trust, be wholly useless.  If, further, it should lead any, in the spirit of candour and of prayer, to give more consideration to this doctrine than perhaps hitherto they have done, and especially to consult larger and more learned works upon the subject, I shall have great additional reason to be thankful.

It is, I hope, hardly necessary to add that there is no intention or desire in anything here said to pass judgment upon individuals, either within or without our own communion.  It will be found stated in the following discourses how readily we believe that many receive the benefits of the Christian altar and sacrifice who are yet unconscious of them; whilst it is also willingly acknowledged, even as regards those who more directly deny Catholic doctrine, that the present divided state of Christendom, and the wide differences of teaching within our own communion, make it a very different thing to be unable to see, (or even to oppose,) the truth than would be the case if the Church were still united, as of old, in one harmonious voice and one external communion, or if there were a perfect unanimity among ourselves.  When, alas, even priests are found to repudiate their priesthood, it must be admitted, without reserve, that there is too much excuse for the laity being uncertain and perplexed.  Whilst this teaches us to award the largest measure of charitable construction to those who differ from us, it gives only the more urgent cause both to state and vindicate the ancient faith, and to shew that it was in God’s mercy preserved to us at the Reformation.

I must not omit to say that I am indebted to Mr. Carter’s excellent treatise for many facts, suggestions, and illustrations, even beyond those which the references given explicitly acknowledge.

M. W. M.

St. Mary’s, West Brompton.
         February 7, 1867.

CONTENTS.