FINGER PRINTS
FINGER PRINTS
BY
FRANCIS GALTON, F.R.S., ETC.
London
MACMILLAN AND CO.
AND NEW YORK
1892
All rights reserved
CONTENTS
PAGE CHAPTER I Introduction 1 Distinction between creases and ridges 1 Origin of the inquiry 2 Summaries of the subsequent chapters 3-21 Viz. of ii., 3; iii., 4; iv., 5; v., 5; vi., 8; vii., 10; viii., 12; ix., 13; x., 14; xi., 16; xii., 17; xiii., 19; CHAPTER II Previous Use of Finger Prints 22 Superstition of personal contact 22 Rude hand-prints 23 Seals to documents 23 Chinese finger marks 24 The tipsahi of Bengal 24 Nail-marks on Assyrian bricks 25 Nail-mark on Chinese coins 25 Ridges and cheiromancy—China, Japan, and by negroes 26 Modern usage—Bewick, Fauld, Tabor, and G. Thompson 26 Their official use by Sir W. J. Herschel 27 CHAPTER III Methods of Printing 30 Impression on polished glass or razor 30 The two contrasted methods of printing
DESCRIPTION OF THE TABLES
PAGE Summary of evidence in favour of finger marks being persistent 96 Interpolation of ridges 104 I. Percentage frequency of Arches, Loops, and Whorls on the different digits, as observed in the 5000 digits of 500 different persons 115 II. Distribution of the A. L. W. patterns on the corresponding digits of the two hands 116 III. Percentage frequency of Arches on the digits of the two hands 117 IV. Percentage frequency of Loops on the digits of the two hands 118 V. Percentage frequency of Whorls on the digits of the two hands 118 VIa. Percentage of cases in which the same class of pattern occurs in the same digits of the two hands 120 VIb. Percentage of cases in which the same class of pattern occurs in various couplets of different digits 120 VII. Couplets of fingers of different names in the same and in the opposite hands 121 VIII. Measures of relationship between the digits on a centesimal scale 129 IX. Index to 100 sets of finger prints 133 X. Number of different index-heads in 100 sets, according to the number of digits noted 136 XI. Number of entries under the same heads in 100 sets 139 XII. Index-headings under which more than 1 per cent of the sets were registered in 500 sets 140 XIII. Percentage of entries falling under a single head in 100, 300, and 500 sets 141 XIV. Number of different index-headings in 100 sets, according to the number of fingers in each set, and to the method of indexing 142 XV. Number of entries in 500 sets, each of the fore, middle, and ring-fingers onlylimiting values were adopted 159 XVII. Distribution of 500 sets of measures, each set consisting of five elements, into classes 160 XVIII. Number of the above sets that fell under the same headings 161 XIX. Further analysis of the two headings that contained the most numerous entries 162 XX. Observed random couplets 174 XXI. Calculated random couplets 174 XXII. Observed fraternal couplets 175 XXIII. Fraternal couplets—random, observed, and utmost feasible 176 XXIV. Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets 181 XXV. Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets—random and observed 182 XXVI. Three fingers of right hand in 150 fraternal couplets—resemblance measured on centesimal scale 182 XXVII. Twins 186 XXVIII. Children of like-patterned parents 188 XXIX. Paternal and maternal influence 190 XXX. Different races, percentage frequency of arches in fore-finger 194 XXXI. Distribution of number of ridges in AH, and of other measures in loops 203 XXXII. Ordinates to their schemes of distribution 204 XXXIII. Comparison of the above with calculated values 205 XXXIV. Proportions of a typical loop on the right and left thumbs respectively 209
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLATES
PAGE I.— Fig. 1. Chinese coin with the symbol of the nail-mark of the Empress Wen-teh 25 Fig. 2. Order on a camp sutler by Mr. Gilbert Thompson, who used his finger print for the same purpose as the scroll-work in cheques, viz. to ensure the detection of erasures 27 II.— Fig. 3. Form of card used at my anthropometric laboratory for finger prints. It shows the places where they are severally impressed, whether dabbed or rolled (p. 40), and the hole by which they are secured in their box 145 Fig. 4. Small printing roller, used in the pocket apparatus, actual size. It may be covered either with india-rubber tubing or with roller composition 40 III.— Fig. 5. Diagram of the chief peculiarities of ridges, called here minutiæ (the scale is about eight times the natural size) 54 Fig. 6. The systems of ridges and the creases in the palm, indicated
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
The palms of the hands and the soles of the feet are covered with two totally distinct classes of marks. The most conspicuous are the creases or folds of the skin which interest the followers of palmistry, but which are no more significant to others than the creases in old clothes; they show the lines of most frequent flexure, and nothing more. The least conspicuous marks, but the most numerous by far, are the so-called papillary ridges; they form the subject of the present book. If they had been only twice as large as they are, they would have attracted general attention and been commented on from the earliest times. Had Dean Swift known and thought of them, when writing about the Brobdingnags, whom he constructs on a scale twelve times as great as our own, he would certainly have made Gulliver express horror at the ribbed fingers of the giants who handled him. The ridges on their palms would have been as broad as the thongs of our coach-whips.
Let no one despise the ridges on account of their smallness, for they are in some respects the most important of all anthropological data. We shall see that they form patterns, considerable in size and of a curious variety of shape, whose boundaries can be firmly outlined, and which are little worlds in themselves. They have the unique merit of retaining all their peculiarities unchanged throughout life, and afford in consequence an incomparably surer criterion of identity than any other bodily feature. They may be made to throw welcome light on some of the most interesting biological questions of the day, such as heredity, symmetry, correlation, and the nature of genera and species. A representation of their lineations is easily secured in a self-recorded form, by inking the fingers in the way that will be explained, and pressing them on paper. There is no prejudice to be overcome in procuring these most trustworthy sign-manuals, no vanity to be pacified, no untruths to be guarded against.
My attention was first drawn to the ridges in 1888 when preparing a lecture on Personal Identification for the Royal Institution, which had for its principal object an account of the anthropometric method of Bertillon, then newly introduced into the prison administration of France. Wishing to treat the subject generally, and having a vague knowledge of the value sometimes assigned to finger marks, I made inquiries, and was surprised to find, both how much had been done, and how much there remained to do, before establishing their theoretical value and practical utility.
Enough was then seen to show that the subject was of real importance, and I resolved to investigate it; all the more so, as the modern processes of photographic printing would enable the evidence of such results as might be arrived at, to be presented to the reader on an enlarged and easily legible form, and in a trustworthy shape. Those that are put forward in the following pages, admit of considerable extension and improvement, and it is only the fact that an account of them seems useful, which causes me to delay no further before submitting what has thus far been attained, to the criticism of others.
I have already published the following memoirs upon this subject: