The Project Gutenberg eBook, The Swastika, by Thomas Wilson
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
Title: The Swastika
The Earliest Known Symbol, and Its Migration; with Observations on the Migration of Certain Industries in Prehistoric Times
Author: Thomas Wilson
Release Date: September 21, 2012 [eBook #40812]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE SWASTIKA***
E-text prepared by Marilynda Fraser-Cunliffe
and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team
(http://www.pgdp.net)
from page images generously made available by
Facsimile Books and Other Digitally Enhanced Works
from the University of Georgia Libraries
(http://djvued.libs.uga.edu)
Note: Images of the original pages are available through Facsimile Books and Other Digitally Enhanced Works from the University of Georgia Libraries. See http://djvued.libs.uga.edu/J84xSI3x1/1f/swastika_history_report.pdf
Transcriber's note:
In the Bibliography section the reader will encounter numerous vertical bars or "pipes" ( | ). These were present in the original book. The reason for their presence is uncertain.
Mismatched/unmatched quotation marks are as in the original.
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION.
UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
THE SWASTIKA,
THE EARLIEST KNOWN SYMBOL, AND ITS MIGRATIONS;
WITH OBSERVATIONS ON THE MIGRATION OF
CERTAIN INDUSTRIES IN PREHISTORIC TIMES.
BY
THOMAS WILSON,
Curator, Department of Prehistoric Anthropology,
U. S. National Museum.
From the Report of the U. S. National Museum for 1894, pages 757-1011,
with plates 1-25 and Figures 1-374.
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
1896.
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
Page. Preface 763 I.—Definitions, Description, and Origin. Different forms of the cross 765 Names and definitions of the Swastika 768 Symbolism and interpretation 770 Origin and habitat 791 II.—Dispersion of the Swastika. Extreme Orient 799 Japan 799 Korea 799 China 799 Tibet 802 India 802 Classical Orient 806 Babylonia, Assyria, Chaldea, and Persia 806 Phenicia 807 Lycaonia 807 Armenia 807 Caucasus 808 Asia Minor—Troy (Hissarlik) 809 First and Second Cities 810 The Third or Burnt City 811 The Fourth CityHemispheres, and Believed to have passed by Migration. Spindle whorls 966 Europe 967 Switzerland—Lake dwellings 967 Italy 968 Wurtemburg 968 France 968 North America—pre-Columbian times 969 Mexico 970 Central America 971 Nicaragua 971 South America 972 Chiriqui 972 Colombia 972 Peru 972 Bobbins 975 Europe 975 United States 975 VIII.—Similar Prehistoric Arts, Industries, and Implements in Europe and
America as Evidence of the Migration of Culture. 977 Conclusion 981 Bibliography 984 List of Illustrations 997
THE SWASTIKA,
THE EARLIEST KNOWN SYMBOL, AND ITS MIGRATIONS; WITH OBSERVATIONS ON THE
MIGRATION OF CERTAIN INDUSTRIES IN PREHISTORIC TIMES.
By Thomas Wilson,
Curator, Department of Prehistoric Anthropology, U. S. National Museum.
PREFACE.
An English gentleman, versed in prehistoric archæology, visited me in the summer of 1894, and during our conversation asked if we had the Swastika in America. I answered, “Yes,” and showed him two or three specimens of it. He demanded if we had any literature on the subject. I cited him De Mortillet, De Morgan, and Zmigrodzki, and he said, “No, I mean English or American.” I began a search which proved almost futile, as even the word Swastika did not appear in such works as Worcester’s or Webster’s dictionaries, the Encyclopædic Dictionary, the Encyclopædia Britannica, Johnson’s Universal Cyclopædia, the People’s Cyclopædia, nor Smith’s Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, his Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, or his Classical Dictionary. I also searched, with the same results, Mollett’s Dictionary of Art and Archæology, Fairholt’s Dictionary of Terms in Art, “L’Art Gothique,” by Gonza, Perrot and Chipiez’s extensive histories of Art in Egypt, in Chaldea and Assyria, and in Phenicia; also “The Cross, Ancient and Modern,” by W. W. Blake, “The History of the Cross,” by John Ashton; and a reprint of a Dutch work by Wildener. In the American Encyclopædia the description is erroneous, while all the Century Dictionary says is, “Same as fylfot,” and “Compare Crux Ansata and Gammadion.” I thereupon concluded that this would be a good subject for presentation to the Smithsonian Institution for “diffusion of knowledge among men.”
The principal object of this paper has been to gather and put in a compact form such information as is obtainable concerning the Swastika, leaving to others the task of adjustment of these facts and their
No conclusion is attempted as to the time or place of origin, or the primitive meaning of the Swastika, because these are considered to be lost in antiquity. The straight line, the circle, the cross, the triangle, are simple forms, easily made, and might have been invented and re-invented in every age of primitive man and in every quarter of the globe, each time being an independent invention, meaning much or little, meaning different things among different peoples or at different times among the same people; or they may have had no settled or definite meaning. But the Swastika was probably the first to be made with a definite intention and a continuous or consecutive meaning, the knowledge of which passed from person to person, from tribe to tribe, from people to people, and from nation to nation, until, with possibly changed meanings, it has finally circled the globe.
There are many disputable questions broached in this paper. The author is aware of the differences of opinion thereon among learned men, and he has not attempted to dispose of these questions in the few sentences employed in their announcement. He has been conservative and has sought to avoid dogmatic decisions of controverted questions. The antiquity of man, the locality of his origin, the time of his dispersion and the course of his migration, the origin of bronze and the course of its migration, all of which may be more or less involved in a discussion of the Swastika, are questions not to be settled by the dogmatic assertions of any individual.
Much of the information in this paper is original, and relates to prehistoric more than to modern times, and extends to nearly all the countries of the globe. It is evident that the author must depend on other discoverers; therefore, all books, travels, writers, and students have been laid under contribution without scruple. Due acknowledgment is hereby made for all quotations of text or figures wherever they occur.
Quotations have been freely made, instead of sifting the evidence and giving the substance. The justification is that there has never been any sufficient marshaling of the evidence on the subject, and that the former deductions have been inconclusive; therefore, quotations of authors are given in their own words, to the end that the philosophers who propose to deal with the origin, meaning, and cause of migration of the Swastika will have all the evidence before them.
Assumptions may appear as to antiquity, origin, and migration of the Swastika, but it is explained that many times these only reflect the opinion of the writers who are quoted, or are put forth as working hypotheses.
The indulgence of the reader is asked, and it is hoped that he will endeavor to harmonize conflicting statements upon these disputed questions rather than antagonize them.
I.—Definitions, Description, and Origin.
DIFFERENT FORMS OF THE CROSS.
The simple cross made with two sticks or marks belongs to prehistoric times. Its first appearance among men is lost in antiquity. One may theorize as to its origin, but there is no historical identification of it either in epoch or by country or people. The sign is itself so simple that it might have originated among any people, however primitive, and in any age, however remote. The meaning given to the earliest cross is equally unknown. Everything concerning its beginning is in the realm of speculation. But a differentiation grew up in early times among nations by which certain forms of the cross have been known under certain names and with specific significations. Some of these, such as the Maltese cross, are historic and can be well identified.
The principal forms of the cross, known as symbols or ornaments, can be reduced to a few classes, though when combined with heraldry its use extends to 385 varieties.[1]
Fig. 1.LATIN CROSS
(Crux immissa). Fig. 2.
GREEK CROSS. Fig. 3.
ST. ANDREW’S CROSS
(Crux decussata).
It is not the purpose of this paper to give a history of the cross, but the principal forms are shown by way of introduction to a study of the Swastika.
The Latin cross, Crux immissa, (fig. 1) is found on coins, medals, and ornaments anterior to the Christian era. It was on this cross that Christ is said to have been crucified, and thus it became accepted as the Christian cross.
The Greek cross (fig. 2) with arms of equal length crossing at right angles, is found on Assyrian and Persian monuments and tablets, Greek coins and statues.
The St. Andrew’s cross, Crux decussata, (fig. 3) is the same as the Greek cross, but turned to stand on two legs.
Fig. 4.
EGYPTIAN CROSS.
(Crux ansata).
The Key of Life.
The Crux ansata (fig. 4) according to Egyptian mythology, was Ankh, the emblem of Ka, the spiritual double of man. It was also said to indicate a union of Osiris and Isis, and was regarded as a symbol of the generative principle of nature.
The Tau cross (fig. 5), so called from its resemblance to the Greek letter of that name, is of uncertain, though ancient, origin. In Scandinavian mythology it passed under the name of “Thor’s hammer,” being therein confounded with the Swastika. It was also called St. Anthony’s cross for the Egyptian hermit of that name, and was always colored blue. Clarkson says this mark was received by the Mithracists on their foreheads at the time of their initiation. C. W. King, in his work entitled “Early Christian Numismatics” (p. 214), expresses the opinion that the Tau cross was placed on the foreheads of men who cry after
Another variety of the cross appeared about the second century, composed of a union of the St. Andrew’s cross and the letter P (fig. 6), being the first two letters of the Greek word ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ (Christus). This, with another variety containing all the foregoing letters, passed as the monogram of Christ (fig. 6).
As an instrument of execution, the cross, besides being the intersection of two beams with four projecting arms, was frequently of compound forms as , on which the convicted person was fastened by the feet and hung head downward. Another form , whereon he was fastened by one foot and one hand at each upper corner; still another form , whereon his body was suspended on the central upright with his arms outstretched upon the cross beams.
Fig. 5.TAU CROSS, THOR’S HAMMER,
OR ST. ANTHONY’S CROSS. Fig. 6.
MONOGRAM OF CHRIST.
Labarum of Constantine. Fig. 7.
MALTESE CROSS.
Fig. 7 represents the sign of the military order of the Knights of Malta. It is of medieval origin.
Fig. 8 (a and b) represents two styles of Celtic crosses. These belong chiefly to Ireland and Scotland, are usually of stone, and frequently set up at marked places on the road side.
Higgins, in his “Anacalypsis,” a rare and costly work, almost an encyclopedia of knowledge,[2] says, concerning the origin of the cross, that the official name of the governor of Tibet, Lama, comes from the ancient Tibetan word for the cross. The original spelling was L-a-m-h. This is cited with approval in Davenport’s “Aphrodisiacs” (p. 13).
a b Fig. 8. CELTIC CROSSES. Fig. 9.NORMAL
SWASTIKA. Fig. 10.
SUAVASTIKA.