أنت هنا
قراءة كتاب The Fabric of Civilization A Short Survey of the Cotton Industry in the United States
تنويه: تعرض هنا نبذة من اول ١٠ صفحات فقط من الكتاب الالكتروني، لقراءة الكتاب كاملا اضغط على الزر “اشتر الآن"
The Fabric of Civilization A Short Survey of the Cotton Industry in the United States
school. On shipboard he met the widow of Nathaniel Greene, the Revolutionary general. Mrs. Greene invited the youth to begin his residence in the South on her plantation at Mulberry Grove, Georgia. Here one evening, some officers, late of General Greene’s command, were discussing the great wealth which might come to the South were there a suitable machine for removing stubborn Upland fiber from its green seed. The story goes that while the discussion was at its height, Mrs. Greene said:
"Gentlemen, apply to my young friend, Mr. Whitney. He can make anything."
Whitney commenced work on the problem. A room was set aside as his workshop, and it was not long before he had produced the beginnings of the gin. He fixed wire teeth in a board, and found that by pulling the fibers through with his fingers he could leave the tenacious seed behind. He carried this basic idea further by putting the teeth on a cylinder and by providing a rotating brush to clean the fiber from the teeth.
The changes which followed immediately 8 upon the introduction of the cotton gin were tremendous in scope and almost innumerable. There was a time, before cotton became a staple, when the South led New England in manufacturing. That time passed almost immediately. Iron works and coal mines were abandoned, and men turned their energies from the culture of corn, rice, and indigo largely to the raising of the cotton.
Expansion in
Production
The following figures, giving production in the equivalent of 500 pound bales for the year at the close of each ten-year period, give some idea of the tremendous expansion which ensued.
Year | 500 Pound Bales |
1790 | 3,138 |
1800 | 73,222 |
1810 | 177,824 |
1820 | 334,728 |
1830 | 732,218 |
1840 | 1,347,640 |
1850 | 2,136,083 |
1860 | 3,841,416 |
1870 | 4,024,527 |
1880 | 6,356,998 |
1890 | 8,562,089 |
1900 | 10,123,027 |
1910 | 11,608,616 |
1917 | 11,302,375 |
By this table it will be seen that the Civil War and the freeing of the slaves held up production only temporarily. In 1914, the banner year, the crop reached the tremendous total of 16,134,930 bales of five hundred pounds each.
Some little spinning had been done in the seventeenth century, but in 1787-88 the first permanent factory, built of brick, and located in Beverly, Massachusetts, on the Bass river, was put into operation by a group headed by John Cabot and Joshua Fisher. This factory failed to justify itself economically, chiefly because of the crudeness of its machinery. But Samuel Slater, newly come from England with models of the Arkwright machinery in his brain, set up a factory in Pawtucket in 1790. From that time forth the growth was steady and sure, if not always extremely rapid.
The following table,[A] which covers the whole country, relates particularly to New England in the years before 1880, because the cotton manufacturing industry until then was largely concentrated there. It shows how the manufacturing interests of the country profited by the discovery that brought wealth to the agricultural South:
Year | Number of Estab- lish- ments |
Number of Spindles |
Cotton Used in Million Pounds |
Number of Employes |
Value of Product in Dollars |
1810 | 87,000 | ||||
1820 | 220,000 | ||||
1830 | 795 | 1,200,000 | 77.8 | 62,177 | $32,000,000 |
1840 | 1240 | 2,300,000 | 113.1 | 72,119 | 46,400,000 |
1850 | 1094 | 3,600,000 | 276.1 | 92,286 | 61,700,000 |
1860 | 1091 | 5,200,000 | 422.7 | 122,028 | 115,700,000 |
1870 | 956 | 7,100,000 | 398.3 | 135,369 | 177,500,000 |
1880 | 756 | 10,700,000 | 750.3 | 174,659 | 192,100,000 |
1890 | 905 | 14,200,000 | 1,118.0 | 218,876 | 268,000,000 |
1900 | 973 | 19,000,000 | 1,814.0 | 297,929 | 332,800,000 |
1910 | 1208 | 27,400,000 | 2,332.2 | 371,120 | 616,500,000 |
1918 | 34,940,830 | 3,278.2 |
The North, having this growing interest in an industry struggling against the experience and ability of the more firmly established English market, sought naturally for the protection given by a high tariff. The South, having definitely dropped manufacturing, pleaded with Congress always for a low tariff, and the right to deal in human chattels.
There is little need to go further into the rift which began to develop almost immediately. In 1861 the split occurred. The war between the States caused hardly more suffering than the blockade which cut off the spinners of Manchester from the vegetable wool which supplied them the means of living. Cotton proved its power and its domination. It was a beneficent monarch, but it brooked no denial of its overlordship.