أنت هنا
قراءة كتاب The Conflict between Private Monopoly and Good Citizenship
تنويه: تعرض هنا نبذة من اول ١٠ صفحات فقط من الكتاب الالكتروني، لقراءة الكتاب كاملا اضغط على الزر “اشتر الآن"
The Weinstock Lectures on The
Morals of Trade
THE CONFLICT BETWEEN PRIVATE MO-
NOPOLY AND GOOD CITIZENSHIP. By
John Graham Brooks.
COMMERCIALISM AND JOURNALISM. By
Hamilton Holt.
THE BUSINESS CAREER IN ITS PUBLIC
RELATIONS. By Albert Shaw.
THE CONFLICT BETWEEN
PRIVATE MONOPOLY AND
GOOD CITIZENSHIP
THE CONFLICT BETWEEN
PRIVATE MONOPOLY AND
GOOD CITIZENSHIP
BY
JOHN GRAHAM BROOKS
PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL CONSUMERS' LEAGUE
AUTHOR OF "THE SOCIAL UNREST,"
"AS OTHERS SEE US," ETC.
BOSTON AND NEW YORK
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY
The Riverside Press Cambridge
1909
COPYRIGHT, 1909, BY THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Published December 1909
BARBARA WEINSTOCK
LECTURES ON THE MORALS
OF TRADE
This series will contain essays by
representative scholars and men of
affairs dealing with the various phases
of the moral law in its bearing on
business life under the new economic
order, first delivered at the University
of California on the Weinstock foundation.
THE CONFLICT BETWEEN
PRIVATE MONOPOLY AND
GOOD CITIZENSHIP
For a special purpose, I have had occasion to examine with care the comments upon American life and institutions made by foreign critics during the period that extends from the later part of the eighteenth century up to the present time. If one puts aside the frivolous and ill-tempered studies and considers alone the fairer and more competent observers, the least pleasant of all the criticisms is that we are essentially a lawless people.
If the critic, like de Tocqueville and Miss Martineau, had sympathy and admiration for us, the revealed lawlessness came as an astonishment, because it seemed to upset all sorts of pretty theories about democracy. The doctrinaires had worked out to perfection the idea that a people who could freely make and unmake their own laws would, for that plain reason, respect the laws. Of course, a people who had laws thrust upon them from above would hate them and disobey them. But a democracy would escape this temptation.
It was apparently an amusement of many of these writers to collect, as did the jaunty author of "Peter Simple" in his Diary, interminable pages from our own press to illustrate the general contempt for those laws which really interfered with pleasures or economic interests. Harriet Martineau drove through Boston on the day when Garrison was being dragged through the streets. The flame of her indignation burned high; but it burned with new heat when she found that the very best of Boston culture and respectability would not lift a finger or pay a copper to have the law enforced in Mr. Garrison's favor. Beacon Street and Harvard professors told her that the victim was a disreputable agitator, richly deserving what he got. They seemed to think this English lady very cranky and unreasonable. The mob had the entire sympathy of the best people in the community, and that should satisfy her. De Tocqueville had