أنت هنا
قراءة كتاب The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which framed the Constitution of the United States, Volume II (of 2)
تنويه: تعرض هنا نبذة من اول ١٠ صفحات فقط من الكتاب الالكتروني، لقراءة الكتاب كاملا اضغط على الزر “اشتر الآن"

The Journal of the Debates in the Convention which framed the Constitution of the United States, Volume II (of 2)
tag="{http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml}a">[3] N. J. no. Pa no. Del. no. Md no. Va no. N. C. divd. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.
[3] In the printed Journal Cont, no: N. Jersey ay.–Madison's Note.
Mr King was afraid we shd shorten the term too much.
Mr Govr Morris was for a short term, in order to avoid impeachts which wd be otherwise necessary.
Mr Butler was agst the frequency of the elections. Geo. & S. C. were too distant to send electors often.
Mr Elseworth was for 6 years. If the elections be too frequent, the Executive will not be firm eno. There must be duties which will make him unpopular for the moment. There will be outs as well as ins. His administration therefore will be attacked and misrepresented.
Mr Williamson was for 6 years. The expence will be considerable & ought not to be unnecessarily repeated. If the Elections are too frequent, the best men will not undertake the service and those of an inferior character will be liable to be corrupted.
On the question for 6 years?
Mas. ay. Cont ay. N. J. ay. Pa ay. Del. no. Md ay. Va ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.
Adjourned
Friday July 20. in Convention.
The postponed Ratio of Electors for appointing the Executive; to wit 1 for each State whose inhabitants do not exceed 100.000. &c. being taken up.
Mr Madison observed that this would make in time all or nearly all the States equal. Since there were few that would not in time contain the number of inhabitants intitling them to 3 Electors; that this ratio ought either to be made temporary, or so varied as that it would adjust itself to the growing population of the States.
Mr Gerry moved that in the 1st instance the Electors should be allotted to the States in the following ratio: to N. H. 1. Mass. 3. R. I. 1. Cont 2. N. Y. 2. N. J. 2. Pa 3. Del. 1. Md 2. Va 3. N. C. 2. S. C. 2. Geo. 1.
On the question to postpone in order to take up this motion of Mr Gerry. It passed in the affirmative
Mass. ay. Cont no. N. J. no. Pa ay. Del. no. Md no. Va ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.
Mr Elseworth moved that 2 Electors be allotted to N. H. Some rule ought to be pursued; and N. H. has more than 100,000 inhabitants. He thought it would be proper also to allot 2. to Georgia.
Mr Broom & Mr Martin moved to postpone Mr Gerry's allotment of Electors, leaving a fit ratio to be reported by the Committee to be appointed for detailing the Resolutions.
On this motion,
Mass. no. Ct no. N. J. ay. Pa no. Del. ay. Md ay. Va no. N. C. no. S. C. no. Geo. no.
Mr Houston 2ded the motion of Mr Elseworth to add another Elector to N. H. & Georgia. On the Question;
Mass. no. Ct ay. N. J. no. Pa no. Del. no. Md no. Va no. N. C. no. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.
Mr Williamson moved as an amendment to Mr Gerry's allotment of Electors in the 1st instance that in future elections of the Natl Executive, the number of Electors to be appointed by the several States shall be regulated by their respective numbers of Representatives in the 1st branch pursuing as nearly as may be the present proportions.
On question on Mr Gerry's ratio of Electors
Mass. ay. Ct ay. N. J. no. Pa ay. Del. no. Md no. Va ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. no.
"to be removable on impeachment and conviction for malpractice or neglect of duty," see Resol. 9.
Mr Pinkney & Mr Govr Morris moved to strike out this part of the Resolution. Mr P. observd he ought not to be impeachable whilst in office.
Mr Davie. If he be not impeachable whilst in office, he will spare no efforts or means whatever to get himself re-elected. He considered this as an essential security for the good behaviour of the Executive.
Mr Wilson concurred in the necessity of making the Executive impeachable whilst in office.
Mr Govr Morris. He can do no criminal act without Coadjutors who may be punished. In case he should be re-elected, that will be a sufficient proof of his innocence. Besides who is to impeach? Is the impeachment to suspend his functions. If it is not the mischief will go on. If it is the impeachment will be nearly equivalent to a displacement, and will render the Executive dependent on those who are to impeach.
Col. Mason. No point is of more importance than that the right of impeachment should be continued. Shall any man be above Justice? Above all shall that man be above it, who can commit the most extensive injustice? When great crimes were committed he was for punishing the principal as well as the Coadjutors. There had been much debate & difficulty as to the mode of chusing the Executive. He approved of that which had been adopted at first, namely of referring the appointment to the Natl Legislature. One objection agst Electors was the danger of their being corrupted by the Candidates, & this furnished a peculiar reason in favor of impeachments whilst in office. Shall the man who has practised corruption & by that means procured his appointment in the first instance, be suffered to escape punishment, by repeating his guilt?
Docr Franklin was for retaining the clause as favorable to the Executive. History furnishes one example only of a first Magistrate being formally brought to public Justice. Every body cried out agst this as unconstitutional. What was the practice before this in cases where the Chief Magistrate rendered himself obnoxious? Why recourse was had to assassination in wch he was not only deprived of his life but of the opportunity of vindicating his character. It wd be the best way therefore to provide in the Constitution for the regular punishment of the Executive where his misconduct should deserve it, and for his honorable acquittal where he should be unjustly accused.
Mr Govr Morris admits corruption & some few other offences to be such as ought to be impeachable; but thought the cases ought to be enumerated & defined.
Mr Madison thought it indispensable that

