align="right">V.
Conclusion. With reference to current reports of Christianity. Cf. Cleon and Paul (ll. 336-353). |
|
LECTURE III |
BISHOP BLOUGRAM’S APOLOGY |
Dramatic character of poem. |
Connection with preceding poems. |
Identity of Bishop Blougram—Browning’s treatment of subject—Criticisms discussed. |
Indications of identity—A. External. B. Personal characteristics. |
Analysis of Poem. |
I. |
Epilogue (ll. 971-1014). How far is the Bishop serious in his assertions? |
II. |
Introductory. Bishop and Critic (ll. 1-48). |
III. |
Bishop’s Life. Cf. Ideal of Critic (ll. 49-143, 230-240, 749-805). Cf. A Grammarian’s Funeral, Dîs Aliter Visum, Rabbi Ben Ezra, etc. |
IV. |
How far schemes of life reconcilable—Difficulties of consistency in either (ll. 144-212). |
V. |
Positions compared—Advantages of belief (ll. 213-431). |
VI. |
Is life divorced from faith possible? (ll. 432-554.) |
VII. |
Recognition of value of enthusiasm result of faith (ll. 555-646). |
VIII. |
Is “pure faith” possible? (ll. 647-748.) |
IX. |
Deeper thoughts suggested: |
|
Faith increased through conflict with Doubt. |
|
Truth essential to Life. |
|
Mystical element of Blougram’s faith. |
|
LECTURE IV |
CHRISTMAS EVE AND EASTER DAY (i) |
Special interest of poems, common and individual. |
Christmas Eve. Faith corporate. |
I. |
Realism in Art, I-IV—Zion Chapel and Methodism—Soliloquist at first capable of criticism only—Inspiration of Love wanting (ll. 117-118, 139-184). |
II. |
Truth absolute, IV-IX—God revealed in Nature as Power and Love—Knowledge finite, Love infinite. |
|
The Vision (ll. 373-520)—Essentials of worship, spirit and truth. |
III. |
Rome, St. Peter’s, X-XII. Symbolism or materialism in worship? |
IV. |
German University, XIII-XVIII—Historic criticism by Lecturer of Christian creed—Treatment of criticism by soliloquist. |
V. |
Mental attitude, result of night’s experience, XIX-XXI. |
|
|
(i) Easy tolerance, succeeded by (ii) realization of necessity of individual acceptance of creed. |
VI. |
Return to Zion Chapel and ultimate choice of creed, XXII. Reasons for choice. |
|
LECTURE V |
CHRISTMAS EVE AND EASTER DAY (ii) |
Easter Day. Faith individual. |
Part I, |
Sections I-XII. Discussion between First Speaker, struggling with difficulties involved in practical acceptance of Christianity, and Second Speaker, who would hold the Faith without question. |
|
First Speaker, I (ll. 1-12, 15-17, 21-28), III, V, VII (ll. 171-203), VIII, X, XII. |
|
Second Speaker, I (ll. 13, 14, 18-20), II, IV, VI, VII (ll. 204-226), IX, XI. |
Part II. |
The Vision. Sections XIII-XXXIII. |
|
Introductory, XIII, XIV. |
|
The Judgment, XV-XXII; Character of. |
|
Results. Freedom in complete possession of Earth. No satisfaction derivative therefrom in (a) Nature, XXIII, XXIV; (b) Art, XXV, XXVI; (c) Intellectual attainment, XXVII, XXVIII; (d) Love—sought as final refuge, XXIX-XXX (l. 969). |
|
Argument in favour of credibility of Gospel story, XXX (ll. 969-990). |
|
Ultimate results of Vision—Acceptance of existing uncertainty rather than of satiety within temporal limitations, XXXI-XXXIII. |
|
LECTURE VI |
CHRISTMAS EVE AND EASTER DAY (iii) |
General character of poems. How far dramatic? |
Expression of Browning’s personal opinions under dramatic guise on |
I. |
Doctrine of the Incarnation. |
II. |
Faith and Life temporal. |
III. |
Judgment and Future Punishment. |
Dramatic element stronger in references to |
IV. |
Roman Catholicism. |
V. |
Nonconformity of “Zion Chapel.” |
VI. |
Asceticism. |
|
LECTURE VII |
LA SAISIAZ |
Peculiar interest attaching as direct expression of Browning’s thought. |
General character of poem. Cf. Prospice. |
Prologue outcome of conclusions of poem. |
Circumstances giving rise to La Saisiaz. |
Death of Miss Egerton-Smith, 1877. |
Analysis of Poem. |
A. |
Prelude (ll. 1-404). |
|
(i) |
Narrative of events leading to subsequent reflections (ll. 1-139). |
|
(ii) |
Immortality of the soul—Treatment of question (ll. 139-179). |
|
(iii) |
Nature of Immortality (ll. 179-216). |
|
(iv) |
Primary truths constituting basis of succeeding argument (ll. 217-234). |
|
(v) |
Grounds for belief in a future life—Imperfections of present life—Its probationary character—Preponderance of evil (ll. 235-404). |
B. |
Argument, imaginary, between Fancy and Reason (ll. 405-524). |
|