You are here
قراءة كتاب Some Diversions of a Man of Letters
تنويه: تعرض هنا نبذة من اول ١٠ صفحات فقط من الكتاب الالكتروني، لقراءة الكتاب كاملا اضغط على الزر “اشتر الآن"
SOME DIVERSIONS
OF
A MAN OF LETTERS
BY
EDMUND GOSSE, C.B.
LONDON
WILLIAM HEINEMANN
1920
New Impressions November 1919; February 1920
OTHER WORKS BY MR. EDMUND GOSSE
Northern Studies. 1879.
Life of Gray. 1882.
Seventeenth-Century Studies. 1883.
Life of Congreve. 1888.
A History of Eighteenth-Century Literature. 1889.
Life of Philip Henry Gosse, F.R.S. 1890.
Gossip in a Library. 1891.
The Secret of Narcisse: A Romance. 1892.
Questions at Issue. 1893.
Critical Kit-Kats. 1896.
A Short History of Modern English Literature. 1897.
Life and Letters of John Donne. 1899.
Hypolympia. 1901.
Life of Jeremy Taylor. 1904.
French Profiles. 1904.
Life of Sir Thomas Browne. 1905.
Father and Son. 1907.
Life of Ibsen. 1908.
Two Visits to Denmark. 1911.
Collected Poems. 1911.
Portraits and Sketches. 1912.
Inter Arma. 1916.
Three French Moralists. 1918.
TO
EVAN CHARTERIS
CONTENTS
PAGE | |
Preface: On Fluctuations of Taste | 1 |
The Shepherd of the Ocean | 13 |
The Songs of Shakespeare | 29 |
Catharine Trotter, the Precursor of the Bluestockings | 37 |
The Message of the Wartons | 63 |
The Charm of Sterne | 91 |
The Centenary of Edgar Allen Poe | 101 |
The Author of "Pelham" | 115 |
The Challenge of the Brontës | 139 |
Disraeli's Novels | 151 |
Three Experiments in Portraiture— | |
I. Lady Dorothy Nevill | 181 |
II. Lord Cromer | 196 |
III. The Last Days of Lord Redesdale | 216 |
The Lyrical Poetry of Thomas Hardy | 231 |
Some Soldier Poets | 259 |
The Future of English Poetry | 287 |
The Agony of the Victorian Age | 311 |
Index | 338 |
PREFACE:
ON FLUCTUATIONS OF TASTE
When Voltaire sat down to write a book on Epic Poetry, he dedicated his first chapter to "Differences of Taste in Nations." A critic of to-day might well find it necessary, on the threshold of a general inquiry, to expatiate on "Differences of Taste in Generations." Changes of standard in the arts are always taking place, but it is only with advancing years, perhaps, that we begin to be embarrassed by the recurrence of them. In early youth we fight for the new forms of art, for the new æsthetic shibboleths, and in that happy ardour of battle we have no time or inclination to regret the demigods whom we dispossess. But the years glide on, and, behold! one morning, we wake up to find our own predilections treated with contempt, and the objects of our own idolatry consigned to the waste-paper basket. Then the matter becomes serious, and we must either go on struggling for a cause inevitably lost, or we must give up the whole matter in indifference. This week I read, over the signature of a very clever and very popular literary character of our day, the remark that Wordsworth's was "a genteel mind of the third rank." I put down the newspaper in which this airy dictum was printed, and, for the first time, I was glad that poor Mr. Matthew Arnold was no longer with us. But, of course, the evolutions of taste must go on, whether they hurt the living and the dead, or no.
Is there, then, no such thing as a permanent element of poetic beauty? The curious fact is that leading critics in each successive generation are united in believing that there is, and that the reigning favourite conforms to it. The life of a