alt="brace" tag="{http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml}img"/>

 
C. 
 
    B. 451. Frere,
Gifford,
Ellis,
Canning,     B. 
 
C. 498. Affectionate Effusion Lord Morpeth, B. 532.

Translation of a Letter Gifford,
Ellis,
Canning,
Frere,  
C. 
    B. 602. Ballynahinch Canning, C.   Viri eruditi Canning, B. 623. New Morality Canning,
Frere,
Gifford,
Ellis, B.
 
C.    From Mental Mists Frere, W.   Yet venial Vices, &c. Canning, W. 624. Bethink thee, Gifford, &c. These lines were
written by Mr. Canning some years before he
had any personal acquaintance with Mr. Gifford. 625. Awake! for shame! Canning, W. 628. Fond Hope! Frere, W. 629. Such is the liberal Justice Canning, W. 631. O Nurse of Crimes Frere,
Canning,
G. Ellis, W. 632. See Louvet Canning, W. 633. But hold severer Virtue Frere,
Canning, W. 634. To thee proud Barras bows Frere,
Canning,
Ellis, W. 635. Ere long perhaps Gifford,
Ellis, W.   Couriers and Stars Frere,
Canning, W. 637. Britain beware Canning, W.

Wright, the publisher of the Anti-Jacobin, lived at 169. Piccadilly, and his shop was the general morning resort of the friends of the ministry, as Debrell's was of the oppositionists. About the time when the Anti-Jacobin was contemplated, Owen, who had been the publisher of Burke's pamphlets, failed. The editors of the Anti-Jacobin took his house, paying the rent, taxes, &c., and gave it up to Wright, reserving to themselves the first floor, to which a communication was opened through Wright's house. Being thus enabled to pass to their own rooms through Wright's shop, where their frequent visits did not excite any remarks, they contrived to escape particular observation.

Their meetings were most regular on Sundays, but they not unfrequently met on other days of the week, and in their rooms were chiefly written the poetical portions of the work. What was written was generally left open upon the table, and as others of the party dropped in, hints or suggestions were made; sometimes whole passages were contributed by some of the parties present, and afterwards altered by others, so that it is almost impossible to ascertain the names of the authors. Where, in the above notes, a piece is ascribed to different authors, the conflicting statements may arise from incorrect information, but sometimes they arise from the whole authorship being assigned to one person, when in fact both may have contributed. If we look at the references, vol. ii. pp. 420. 532. 623., we shall see Mr. Canning naming several authors, whereas Lord Burghersh assigns all to one author. Mr. Canning's authority is here more to be relied upon. "New Morality" Mr. Canning assigns generally to the four contributors; Mr. Wright has given some interesting particulars by appropriating to each his peculiar portion.

Gifford was the working editor, and wrote most of the refutations and corrections of the "Lies," "Mistakes," and "Misrepresentations."

The papers on finance were chiefly by Pitt: the first column was frequently for what he might send; but his contributions were uncertain, and generally very late, so that the space reserved for him was sometimes filled up by other matter. He only once met the editors at Wright's.

Upcott, who was at the time assistant in Wright's shop, was employed as amanuensis, to copy out for the printer the various contributions, that the authors' handwriting might not be detected.

Edw. Hawkins.

The Anti-Jacobin (Vol. iii., p. 334.).—In a copy of the Poetry of the Anti-Jacobin, now in my possession, occurs this note in the autograph of Mr. James Boswell:—

"These lines [Lines written by Traveller at Czarco-zelo] were written by William PITT—as I learnt from his nephew on the 28th of May 1808, at a dinner held in honour of his memory."

The sirname is in large capital letters; the year is indistinctly written. This is the note which is indicated in the auction-catalogue of the library of Mr. Boswell, No. 2229.

Bolton Corney.

---

Minor Notes.

Egg and Arrow Ornament.—Mr. Ruskin, in his Stones of Venice, vol. i. p. 305., says—

"The Greek egg and arrow cornice is a nonsense cornice, very noble in its lines, but utterly absurd in its meaning. Arrows have had nothing to do with eggs (at